Perihilar cholangiocarcinoma resection: Is it beneficial for survival in elderly patients?

INTRODUCTION: As the population ages, surgeons are growing frequently faced with hard choices among a vast array of treatment options for the elderly. This study was to investigate safety and efficacy of resection in elderly patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHCC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Literature reading and meta-analysis unveiled that elderly PHCC patients held a higher risk of death within 90 days after hepatectomy relative to younger patients, but their 5-year overall survival and disease-free survival were comparable. Among PHCC patients who underwent hepatectomy, the proportion of elderly patients with tumor classification Bismuth I-II and tumor stage pStage 1-3 was significantly higher than that of younger patients. RESULTS: Curative resection R0 was more common in elderly patients than younger patients, but the difference was not statistically significant. Because of more comorbidities and less physiological reserve of elderly patients, they seemed to suffer more postoperative complications. CONCLUSION: Considering improved life expectancy, it is crucial to treat elderly PHCC patients appropriately and attempts should be made to radical surgery based on comorbidities and functional status.

Duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection vs. pancreatoduodenectomy for benign lesions and low-grade malignancies of the pancreatic head.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To compare the postoperative results of duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection (DPPHR) techniques with those of conventional pancreatoduodenectomy (PD). METHODOLOGY: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 58 patients who underwent DPPHR or PD at Jinhua central hospital between May 1998 and May 2011. RESULTS: Eighteen patients underwent DPPHR (Group 1) and 40 conventional PD (Group 2). They were followed up for more than 6 months. Operation time in Group 1 was longer (290±18 min vs 269±14 min, p=0.001). Estimated blood loss in Group 1 was more (633±88 mL vs. 495±131 mL, p=0.003). Intraoperative transfusion in Group 1 was more (533±88 mL vs. 335±218 mL, p=0,001). However, postoperative transfusion was Iess (141±162 mL vs. 440±193 mL, p=0.000). Group 1 had a lower short-term complication rate (16.67% vs. 50.0%, p=0.0 16) and long-term complication rate (11.11% vs. 45.0%, p=0.012). Hospital mortality of both groups were 0. CONCLUSIONS: DPPHR for benign or premalignant lesions is a difficult procedure, but with a lower complication rate than conventional PD. Preserving the entire duodenum and a normal biliary tree allows better short-term and long-term results. DPPHR will be suitable for only a small group of patients and should be performed by experienced surgeons.

[Surgical treatment for hepatic metastases from colorectal carcinoma].

OBJECTIVE: To explore the indications and effect of surgical resection for hepatic metastases from colorectal adenocarcinoma and to discuss the implications of clinicopathologic features on the prognosis. METHODS: A retrospective study of 61 patients undergoing hepatectomy for metastatic tumors from colorectal adenocarcinoma from January 1991 to December 2000 in our hospital was performed retrospectively. RESULTS: The 1-, 3- and 5-year survival rates after hepatic resection were 72.13%, 58.10% and 26.01% respectively. Complications occurred in 8 cases. Tumor pesudomembrance was found in 20 cases. Dukes stage, pathologic type,the number of hepatic metastases and tumor pesudomembrance were all significant factors for prognosis after surgery (P< 0.05). The 3-year survival rate of the patients with postoperative comprehensive treatment was higher than that with non-postoperative treatment (P< 0.05). The size of hepatic metastases and the resecting time didn't affect the prognosis (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: The hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer should be treated by a surgical approach. The earlier stage of clinical pathology,higher differentiation extent, metastases less than 3, the formation of pesudomembrance of the metastatic tumor and the postoperative comprehensive treatment predict a better survival.

[Primary common bile duct closure after choledochotomy].

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the rationality and feasibility of primary closure of the common bile duct after choledochotomy for common bile duct calculi. METHODS: From January 1990 to June 2001, 386 patients with the evidence of stones in the common bile duct underwent choledochotomy. Among them, 215 received primary closure of the common bile duct (group A) and 171 T-tube drainage (group B). The patients with emergency operations were excluded. Intraoperative choledochoscopy or cholangiography was routinely performed to rule out the possibility of retained stones. The duct was meticulously stitched using 0/3 to 0/5 absorbent sutures for primary closure. A T-tube was placed in the subhepatic space in the patients of both groups. RESULTS: Postoperative bile leakage was seen in 9 patients of group A and in 5 of group B, respectively (P > 0.05), and no reoperations were necessary. After surgery, the average time and volume of transfusion was 4.9 days and 9.1 liters in group A, versus 7.3 days and 12.8 liters in group B (P < 0.01). The patients in group B had a longer postoperative hospital stay than the those in group A (average 17.6:10.0 days, P < 0.01). T-tube removal resulted in bile peritonitis in 5 patients at day 16, 17, 19, 21 and 22 after surgery in group B, and 3 patients required repeated surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Primary closure of the common bile duct after choledochotomy is safe, effective, and inexpensive in selected patients with common bile duct calculi, and should be regarded as an alternative procedure.